Total Access Baseball

User login

Who's online

There are currently 0 users and 0 guests online.

Are the Yankees or Dodgers in More Trouble Heading into 2016?

It wouldn't be an offseason without the New York Yankees and Los Angeles Dodgers throwing their weight around.

If that statement is true, this might not be an offseason.

Oh, sure, it's only mid-December. There's still plenty of time for the Yanks and Dodgers, baseball's biggest spenders, to make waves on the free-agent market, the trading block or both.

But the bicoastal behemoths have been notably quiet so far, even as their division rivals have aggressively retooled. Big names have signed and seismic swaps have been consummated, but in baseball's two largest markets, the sound has mostly been crickets.

Now, the question isn't whether New York and Los Angeles are in trouble heading into 2016. That's a given. The question is how much trouble they're inand who's got it worse.

Before we answer that hot-button query, let's take a look at where each squad stands roughly two months before pitchers and catchers report to spring training and what they might do to correct course.

 

Uncertainty in Southern California

So far, the Dodgers offseason has been defined by who they haven't gotten.

They didn't get Zack Greinke, MLB's reigning ERA king, who opted out of his deal with L.A. and bolted across the desert for a $206.5 million payday from the Arizona Diamondbacks.

Now, rather than slotting Greinke next to Clayton Kershaw atop their rotation, the Dodgers will be forced to face him multiple times next season.

They also didn't get Aroldis Chapman when a trade with the Cincinnati Reds stalled amid disturbing allegations of domestic violence against the All-Star closer.

Instead, the Dodgers have settled for a series of mid-level signings, including right-hander Hisashi Iwakuma and veteran second baseman Chase Utley. Oh, and southpaw Brett Anderson accepted the qualifying offer.

That's not nothing, but it's not the something SoCal fans were undoubtedly expecting.

There's still time, but the options are dwindling, particularly on the pitching front. In addition to Greinke, David Price, Jordan Zimmermann and Johnny Cueto have all been snatched up. Cueto went to the archrival San Francisco Giants, adding another ace to the National League West.

The Giants also signed right-hander Jeff Samardzija, while the D-Backs complemented Greinke with a high-profile trade for Shelby Miller. You can question the wisdom of those deals, especially the Miller swap, which cost Arizona a sparkling package of prospects and big league talent.

What's undeniable is that the Giants and Diamondbacks have moved with purpose to plug holes while the Dodgers have dawdled on the sidelines.

In addition to the rotation and bullpen, the Dodgers could use another infielder, unless they're truly comfortable with the soon-to-be 37-year-old Utley as their everyday second baseman.

And their outfield is far from settled. Veterans Carl Crawford and Andre Ethier are question marks, Joc Pederson needs to recover from last season's second-half slide and Yasiel Puig is a divisive enigma, as Bleacher Report's Scott Miller recently detailed.

After winning three straight division titles, the Dodgers look vulnerable. And President of Baseball Operations Andrew Friedman, who made his name with the small-market Tampa Bay Rays, needs to prove he can thrive with a big budget and bigger expectations.

Friedman's philosophy of not overpaying players for past performance is admirable. But it's not foolproof, as Fox Sports' Ken Rosenthal opined:

Maybe a team with an $8.5 billion TV contract should be less worried about avoiding long-term ramifications. Certainly, the front office at times gets too cute, as evidenced by its complicated three-team, 13-player [deal] with the Braves and Marlins last July that actually resulted in net damage to the Dodgers' chances last season.

Rosenthal goes on to propose several moves that could rescue the Dodgers offseason, including signing Japanese hurler Kenta Maeda and shipping out Crawford or Ethier to clear space for free-agent left fielder Alex Gordon.

Whatever Friedman and Co. do, it had better be something, or they could find themselves in an unfamiliar position come October—namely, sitting at home.

 

Bewilderment in the Bronx

OK, "bewilderment" is a strong word, alliteration aside. But this is uncharted territory for the Yankees.

The team that made its reputation handing out megacontracts like candy canes at Christmas has so far acquired outfielder Aaron Hicks from the Minnesota Twins, traded reliever Justin Wilson to the Detroit Tigers for a couple of prospects and made a deal with the Chicago Cubs to bring in second baseman Starlin Castro.

And that's it, basically.

"The goal is to win and win a World Series, and I think when you talk about that, you've got to look at every avenue to improve your club," manager Joe Girardi said Nov. 10, per Dan Martin of the New York Post.

So far, most avenues have apparently led to a dead end.

The problem, of course, is the massive chunks of money the Yankees have tied up in veterans like Alex Rodriguez, Mark Teixeira and CC Sabathia. Those three alone will earn close to $70 million in 2016.

So while New York could use an arm, at least, to stabilize a rotation that begins with Masahiro Tanaka and his balky elbow and gets less stable from there, they might not have the budget to get it done.

Trades remain an option. And closer Andrew Miller, in particular, could fetch a hefty return. But after shipping out Wilson, is it wise for New York to further deplete a relief corps that was among its biggest strengths last season?

Clearly, the Yankees can't afford to stand pat. Not with the Boston Red Sox nabbing Price and closer Craig Kimbrel and the defending American League East champion Toronto Blue Jays still equipped with their potent lineup and anticipating a full season from stud right-hander Marcus Stroman.

Castro, a three-time All-Star who's just 25 years old, offers intriguing potential. But he's not the cavalry New York needs to advance beyond last season's wild-card one-and-done.

 

So Who's in More Trouble?

Obviously, a huge trade or an impact signing could tip the scales one way or the other. Right now, though, the Yankees are in the tougher position.

The competition they face from the Red Sox and Blue Jays is comparable to the challenges L.A. will receive from the Giants and Diamondbacks. And the Dodgers have arguably as many holes to fill and questions to answer.

But they have a couple of advantages.

First, they've got Kershaw, the best pitcher in the game and still, incredibly, a mere 27 years old. Second, while they're clearly not prepared to burn cash, they aren't saddled with as many massive albatross contracts as the Yankees, who appear to have finally maxed out their platinum free-agent credit card.

To put it another way: If you're betting which of these two teams will shell out for a player in the Maeda or Gordon tier, put your bucks on the Dodgers.

That said, each squad is teetering on a dangerous precipice. As things stand now, it's easy to imagine a scenario in which they both miss the playoffs next year.

That's a bold statement. To counteract it, the Yankees and Dodgers need to get more creative, more active and a whole lot bolder themselves.

 

All statistics and contract information current as of Dec. 16 and courtesy of Baseball-Reference.com unless otherwise noted.

Read more MLB news on BleacherReport.com

Poll

Best of the American League
Tampa Bay
19%
Boston
19%
Chicago
7%
Minnesota
10%
Los Angeles
17%
Texas
27%
Total votes: 270

Recent blog posts

Featured Sponsors